Journalism & Investigative Reporting

Investigative journalism operates in hostile territory. Sources demand anonymity. Subjects threaten lawsuits. Governments issue takedown orders. Corporations flood hosting providers with DMCA notices before publication. Mainstream registrars fold at the first legal letterhead. The problem starts at registration. GoDaddy, Namecheap, and Google Domains require real names, real addresses, sometimes ID scans. That metadata becomes exhibit A when a subpoena lands. WHOIS privacy is marketed as protection, but it's cosmetic—the registrar still holds your data and will hand it over under pressure. Payment trails connect domains to bank accounts, credit cards, real identities. Jurisdiction matters more than marketing claims. A US registrar operating under ICANN rules will comply with US court orders, FBI requests, and corporate DMCA campaigns. A registrar in Stockholm or Reykjavik operates under different pressures. Some refuse to answer foreign requests. Some don't log IP addresses during registration. Some accept Monero. Takedown pressure doesn't always come through courts. Registrars receive "friendly" emails from intelligence agencies, threat intelligence firms hired by corporations, or politically connected lawyers. Most registrars suspend domains quietly to avoid legal costs. They terminate accounts for "violation of acceptable use" without specifying which clause or providing appeal. The domain goes dark. Your investigation dies. Payment creates exposure. Credit cards tie domains to real people. PayPal freezes accounts retroactively if content attracts attention. Wire transfers require banks, which require KYC, which creates records. Cryptocurrency offers separation, but most registrars either don't accept it or use payment processors that log everything anyway. Journalists need infrastructure that doesn't cooperate by default. A registrar that doesn't reply to casual legal threats. That doesn't store unnecessary data. That operates outside Five Eyes jurisdiction. That takes Bitcoin or Monero and asks nothing in return. Bunkerdomains exists because the alternatives bend too easily.

Requirements

Source protection through registration anonymity

No real names, no addresses, no ID verification. WHOIS must be redacted by default, not as a paid add-on. Registration logs should not connect domains to IP addresses or payment identities.

Jurisdiction outside subpoena-friendly zones

Registrars in US, UK, or EU Five Eyes countries comply reflexively with government requests. Offshore jurisdiction with real independence from US court orders and intelligence agency pressure.

Resistance to preemptive takedowns

Corporate lawyers send DMCA notices before publication to kill stories. Governments issue vague national security requests. Registrar must require actual court orders from relevant jurisdiction, not just scary letterhead.

Payment methods that don't create identity trails

Credit cards and PayPal link domains to real people and can be frozen retroactively. Cryptocurrency payments—Bitcoin, Monero, Litecoin—without KYC, without requiring exchange accounts that report to tax authorities.

No content monitoring or morality clauses

Acceptable use policies that ban "controversial" or "potentially illegal" content become tools for censorship. Registrar should only respond to court orders from its own jurisdiction, not police content preemptively.

Long-term reliability without sudden policy changes

Registrars that suddenly adopt stricter policies or sell to larger companies endanger active investigations. Clear operational model, transparent about what requests they will and won't honor.

Why bunker fits

No KYC, no identity collection

We don't ask for names, addresses, or ID scans. Sign up with an email or anonymous address. WHOIS privacy is included and non-negotiable. We don't log registration IP addresses.

Crypto-only payments

Bitcoin, Monero, Litecoin. No credit cards, no PayPal, no wire transfers, no banks. Payment and domain ownership stay separated. No retroactive freezes or chargebacks that expose you.

Offshore jurisdiction, minimal compliance

We operate outside Five Eyes. We don't respond to DMCA notices or casual legal threats. Court orders from our jurisdiction matter. Random PDFs from US law firms do not.

No content policy enforcement

We don't scan your site. We don't care what you publish. We're not morality police. If someone doesn't like your investigation, they can pursue legal remedies in appropriate courts—not bypass them by emailing us.

Transparent about what we will and won't do

We don't pretend to be bulletproof. Valid court orders from our jurisdiction will be honored. Everything else gets ignored. No backroom deals, no quiet suspensions, no surprise policy changes.

Recommended TLDs

Hypothetical scenarios

Composites — not actual customers. Illustrative only.

Hypothetical

Hypothetical: Exposing corporate pollution in developing nation

Freelance journalist investigating factory dumping hazardous waste. Corporation has US parent company with expensive legal team. Registered domain through us using .is TLD and Monero payment. Published evidence including internal documents. Corporation's lawyers sent DMCA takedown to us claiming documents were "proprietary." We didn't reply. They sent cease-and-desist threatening defamation suit. We didn't reply. Domain stayed live. Corporation eventually had to respond to story on merits instead of killing it through registrar pressure. Journalist's identity never exposed through registration records.

Hypothetical

Hypothetical: Whistleblower platform for government employees

Small team built secure submission system for leaking documents about procurement fraud. Needed domain that wouldn't fold when government noticed. Used .ch domain, paid with Bitcoin, no WHOIS data. Six months after launch, received vague "national security" email claiming site facilitated unauthorized disclosure of classified information. No court order, no specific jurisdiction, just intimidation. We ignored it. Platform continued operating. Later received actual court order from Swiss court related to different matter—we complied with that one because it was legitimate legal process in our jurisdiction. Team understood the difference.

Hypothetical

Hypothetical: Cross-border investigative collective

Journalists in three countries collaborating on corruption investigation involving officials in multiple governments. Needed infrastructure that wouldn't expose collaborators' locations or identities. Registered multiple domains through us using .se and .im, all paid via Monero from different wallets. Used WHOIS privacy included with all domains. When story published, targeted officials attempted to identify journalists through domain registration records. Found nothing useful. Attempted to pressure registrar through diplomatic channels. We're not in their jurisdiction and don't answer those emails. Investigation continued safely for a year until publication.

FAQ

Related